Thursday, September 9, 2010

The Bechdel Test, Gender Roles and Hegemony

Bechdel's Test

(I apologize for the lighting, it's a work in progress.)


I’m female. It’s an indicative statement that affirms the obvious, yet with those two words a whole set of subtexts is instantly set off. The expectations and implications associated with being female are drawn to attention quite often these days, but there is still a steady undercurrent that defines women as somehow fundamentally different than the generic view of ‘human.’ This subtle, constant work of hegemony is a driving force in the creation and maintenance of gender roles, and the Bechdel Test is only one example.

Hegemony, by definition, is not preached openly or forced onto the populace by coercion. It is accepted as “common sense,” swept under the realm of conscious observation. Through the reinforcement of images and messages that support a dominant group or ideology, hegemony creates a definition of normalcy that goes undetected. This in turn creates a cycle: because something is assumed to be normal, it is incorporated into a hegemony, at which point more people are persuaded of this something’s normalcy.

Most issues with gender roles have been pulled out from this blind spot at least in some form: the exploitation of women in advertising and entertainment, the treatment of women in the workplace, politics, and other forms of leadership. But one that stayed beyond my notice for some time is the general lack of female characters in movies. Sure, most movies now emphasize at least one strong female cast member, but most of the time this character is so busy being female that they don’t have time for basic character development. Too often, women only exist in a narrative because of a familial or romantic connection to a male character; even more regularly, they are restricted to themes associated with the feminine or they are used only as prizes or objects to be rescued and saved. A more recent phenomenon is a problem that arises when the character is taken too far in the other direction: the creators produce an ‘Action Girl’ who has no character traits other than being the designated stand-in for an often inaccurate idea of what strength looks like in a woman.

While it may appear that female characters are stronger and more frequent in storytelling media, the truth is they are still far from being recognized as a generic human being with generic human problems. In the video above, I address this through a discussion of the Bechdel Test. Click here for more information, or watch this video showing even more examples.

Postscript

(Correction: At least than half of the people you meet on a college campus will be female.)

1 comment:

  1. You make some very interesting points. I have to admit, I never actually took into consideration, or at least scrutinized, the roles of women in films. I have to admit, I was just a sucker those schmaltzy "boy rescues/kisses girl" scenes (talk about breaking away from that "tough guise").

    Anyway, it'd be nice to see a female character deviate from your typical maudlin, "romantic counterpart" and be given a more central, intellectualized role in a movie.

    Well, I promise you that if I ever become a well known director, I'll do my utmost to represent women in a more sophisticated style (and I don't mean with poodles in their purses).

    Woah, I've talked too much, but I really liked your blog. Okay then see ya later!

    ReplyDelete